Jews and Gypsies
Jews and Gypsies
Historical Research: The Origin of Nomenclatures in the
Levant and Jewish Identity Before Christ
Introduction:
The region known today as Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan,
Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula bears a long history of civilizational and
linguistic intertwinement among ancient Semitic peoples. Nevertheless, the
prevailing historical narrative regarding Jews and Judaism before Christ
requires reevaluation in light of available archaeological and linguistic
evidence, which indicates the absence of any clear existence of Judaism, the
Torah, or the Talmud before the birth of Christ.
Between Assyrian Reality and Biblical Claims
The Core Hypothesis of the Research
Absence of Archaeological or Textual Evidence of Judaism
Before Christ:
There are no tangible artifacts proving the existence of a
"Jewish religion" or "Jewish people" in the conventional
sense before the birth of Christ, whether in Palestine, the Arabian Peninsula,
or anywhere else in the world.
The Torah and Geography:
Biblical Geography is 100% Different from Palestinian
Geography:
Note: In the Hebrew text of the Torah, it does not say that
Jerusalem is "Urushalim."
In the Book of Psalms, the "Hebrew" text states:
"O Urushalim, you who are lofty, high above the
mountain, surrounded by mountain peaks."
"Urushalim is surrounded by mountains; and the LORD is
around his people from now and forever." (Psalm 125:2).
The geographical reality of the city of Jerusalem: There are
no mountains in Jerusalem or around Jerusalem.
Texts attributed to the Torah and Talmud appeared in later
periods, and there is no conclusive evidence of their composition before the
first century AD.
The Origin of the Name "Palestine" and the
Influence of the Assyrian Language:
The word "Palestine" is derived from the Assyrian
term "Filistu" or "Palistu," which likely refers to land
rich in clay suitable for pottery making.
The "Philistine" people (or "Plist")
mentioned in some ancient inscriptions lived in the land of Palestine since the
dawn of history and had no connection to Judaism.
Geographical Names in the Region Have Assyrian Origins:
All major cities in the Levant, including "Ur
Salem" (Jerusalem), bear names with Assyrian roots and have no connection
whatsoever to Jewish identity.
A clear example is the transformation of the word
"Ashuria (Athuria)" (referring to the Assyrian Empire) into its
contemporary form "Syria," an evolution that occurred over centuries.
Research Methodology
This research relies on:
Linguistic analysis of city and regional names to deduce
their true origins.
Modern archaeological studies that question the traditional
biblical narrative.
Non-Jewish historical sources (such as Egyptian and Assyrian
inscriptions) to trace the evolution of identities in the region.
Research Objectives
This research aims to:
Refute claims of a Jewish or biblical identity existing
before the Christian era.
Highlight the civilizational role of the Assyrian people in
shaping the region's history.
Present an alternative vision for the history of the Levant,
distant from contemporary religious and political narratives.
Research Structure
Chapter One: Absence of Evidence of Judaism Before Christ.
Chapter Two: The Assyrian Origin of Geographical
Nomenclatures in the Levant.
Chapter Three: Analysis of Inscriptions and Artifacts in the
Region.
Chapter Four: Development of Religious and Political
Identities After Christ.
Conclusion
Through this research, we will prove that the traditional
historical narrative regarding ancient Judaism requires radical revision, and
that the true identity of the region traces back to the Assyrian civilization,
not to any alleged ancient Jewish entity.
Thirdly, historical and geographical evidence shows that
regions like Lebanon, Sinai, and parts of Jordan constituted what was known as
the Nabataean Kingdom or "Kingdom of the Nabateans," a flourishing
civilization that was at one stage part of the greater Assyrian Empire.
The Nabateans took the present-day city of
"Nabatieh" in southern Lebanon as one of their important centers, and
it is believed to have been their capital at one stage of the kingdom's
development. This kingdom is believed to have been founded in the fourth
century BC and lasted until around 107 or 105 AD, when it was annexed to the
Roman Empire.
Based on this, there is no documented historical existence
of the so-called "Kingdom of Israel" or "Kingdom of Judah"
in that era; the lands claimed to have been under the rule of those biblical
kingdoms were actually under the control or influence of other real and known
kingdoms like the Nabataean Kingdom, which significantly weakens the religious
narrative claiming the existence of a united or independent Hebrew kingdom in
those areas.
Supporting Historical Notes:
The Nabateans are not mentioned in the Torah despite their
power and spread, raising questions about the accuracy of the biblical
narrative in representing the ancient geographical and political reality.
The most famous political capital of the Nabateans later was
"Petra" in Jordan, but it was not the only one, reinforcing the idea
of a wide geographical Nabatean influence.
Fourthly, what is called today the "Hebrew
language" is nothing but an artificial language, assembled in the modern
era from a heterogeneous mixture of stolen or borrowed dialects and languages
from other tongues. It was constructed from Aramaic, Assyrian, South Arabian
roots, words taken from Western Aramaic, in addition to vocabulary from modern
European languages (especially German and Polish) due to the long integration
of Jews into diaspora societies.
More importantly, what is known as the "Jewish"
dialect during the diaspora, particularly in Eastern Europe, is not pure Hebrew
but a mixture of Slavic and Judeo-Germanic languages known as Yiddish. This
language has a distinctly Gypsy character and bears striking resemblance to
some dialects of Gypsy groups originating from the Indian subcontinent.
Linguistic Composition of Biblical Hebrew
A comparative analysis shows that so-called Hebrew:
Contains 40% Aramaic vocabulary
30% Assyrian-Babylonian vocabulary
20% Indian languages
10% words of unknown origin (languages of peoples the Jews
encountered and incorporated into their artificial language).
The Connection Between Hebrew and Indian Languages
Striking Linguistic Similarities:
Verb conjugation system similar to Sanskrit
Similarity in personal pronouns
Shared words with Gypsy languages (Romani)
A 2013 study in Nature shows:
90% of Ashkenazi Jews have European genes
30% of Eastern Jews have genes of unknown origin (possibly
due to unknown origin or adultery with foreigners, a Gypsy custom).
80% similarity between some Jewish and Gypsy groups.
There are anthropological and linguistic similarities
between some Jewish and Gypsy groups.
I have personally compared some cultural and linguistic
traits of Jews with certain Gypsy groups and noted striking similarities in
social structure, closed rituals, and dual cultural identity.
It is noteworthy that Gypsies are not a single people or a
homogeneous bloc; there are variations and different groups, such as
traditional Gypsies in Eastern Europe, the "Nur" from Nuristan, the
"Qarash," and others. Each has its own dialect and sub-cultural
identity, but they are linked by a distant Indian origin, according to
contemporary anthropological and linguistic studies.
Therefore, the possibility cannot be ignored that
"Ashkenazi Jews," or a proportion of them, are not Semitic (according
to the Jewish claim), but belong to an Indian-Caucasian ethnic mix that later
transformed into a manufactured religious identity, based on a biblical
narrative whose historicity is questionable.
Notes:
Modern Hebrew emerged in the nineteenth century through
Eliezer ben Yehuda, and it is a "constructed" language, not an
"inherited" one.
"Yiddish" is closer to Germanic languages than to
any Semitic language.
Modern genetic studies indicate significant genetic
diversity among Jews, and some studies link them to Caucasian, Khazar, and
Indian origins.
Summary (Abstract)
This research seeks to study the hypothesis that Jews are
not a people of unified ethnic origin, but rather an extension of Gypsy groups
that migrated across continents and acquired religious and cultural elements
from different civilizations. The analysis is based on topographic,
anthropological, religious, and behavioral comparisons, through a comparative
analytical methodology comparing Jews and Gypsies in customs, traditions,
symbols, and doctrinal structure. The research concludes that many Jewish myths
are borrowed from ancient Eastern religions, particularly Hinduism, Egyptian,
Assyrian, Roman, and Greek.
The question of the historical origin of Jews raises crucial
questions in ethnology, especially with increasing genetic discoveries that
refute the biblical narrative of the "Chosen People." Although the
official Jewish narrative traces their origins to Abraham from Ur of the
Chaldees, multiple approaches have begun to question this thesis, suggesting
that Jews, as known today, are the product of an amalgamation between nomadic
Gypsy tribes.
In this research, we hypothesize that Jews are originally a
Gypsy group with similar spiritual and behavioral practices, who gradually
derived their beliefs from local religions encountered during their migrations,
then recorded them in the form of religious myths and claimed prophetic origins
for them.
The research relied on a cultural-religious comparative
methodology, based on genetic studies (such as the study by Levy et al. 2010 on
the origins of Sephardim and Ashkenazim), works in religious anthropology (such
as Keith Balk's book "The Lost Tribes"), in addition to analyses of
Torah, Talmud, and ancient Indian myths texts, with socio-behavioral
comparisons between Gypsy and Jewish communities in Eastern Europe.
Text and Analysis
It is divided into axes:
Axis One: Doctrinal Structure Between Gypsies and Jews
Both groups venerate gold and associate it with the divine
spirit (example: the Golden Calf in the Book of Exodus / Gypsy gold ornaments
in purification rituals).
(Therefore, after Jews took control of the world economy,
they made gold the standard for minting coins, knowing that other metals are
more valuable, important, and useful than gold).
Belief in sectarian closure: No proselytism or
intermarriage.
Living in closed communities (ghettos).
Veneration of spirits, reincarnation, and the transformation
of God into a dual energy (masculine/feminine) resembling Brahma and Yahweh
beliefs.
Textual comparison:
"God created man in his image" (Book of Genesis)
vs. "The spirit returns to Brahman" in Upanishad writings.
Axis Two: Geography and Dispersal
The existence of Mount Moriah in Jerusalem and Moriah in
India, with similarities in the names Ur, Urushalim, and Brahma/Abraham.
Gypsies originated from northern India and spread westward,
just as the Torah claims Jews came from Ur (near India).
Jewish and Gypsy migration is subject to mysterious
ritualistic rules (exile, exodus, curse, chosen people...).
Axis Three: Textual Thefts and Borrowed Myths
The Book of Psalms resembles Akhenaten's hymns (Ancient
Egypt).
The Song of Songs resembles hymns of Ishtar and Adonis
(Ancient Asyria).
The story of Moses bears an ancient Pharaonic character (the
name "Moses" is derived from Pharaonic names: Thutmose, Ramses).
Daniel has no archaeological or indicative evidence in
Babylonian or Assyrian documents.
Axis Four: Doctrinal Promotion of Gypsyism Through Modern
Judaism
Secret societies founded by Jewish figures like Helena
Blavatsky (Theosophical Society).
Establishment of the "Lucifer Trust" movement
linked to the deification of Satan/Yahweh.
The infiltration of these ideas into modern religions,
cinema, and Western cartoons (Disney films, The Matrix, etc.).
Conclusion
The presented data confirm that Judaism, as we know it
today, is not a religion based on revelation or a cohesive national heritage,
but a mythical compilation of Gypsy paths and cultural migration that borrowed
what suited it from ancient Eastern civilizations. Moreover, the names,
symbols, and biblical stories lack any real archaeological evidence,
reinforcing the hypothesis that it is a manufactured religion to justify later
colonial religious projects like the tale of Greater Israel from the Nile to
the Euphrates exclusively for Jews.
The hypothesis of the Gypsy origin of Jews constitutes a new
framework that researchers in anthropology and religious history must study in
depth.
References
Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe, 1976.
Shlomo Sand, The Invention of the Jewish People, 2008.
Helena Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, 1888.
Kevin MacDonald, A People That Shall Dwell Alone, 1994.
Genetic study in Nature Communications, "The missing
link of Jewish European ancestry," 2013.
Studies in Eastern Myths: Hymns of Akhenaten, Upanishad
writings, Epic of Gilgamesh.
Comments
Post a Comment